Patent Litigation

So many firms have the qualifications required for patent litigation, yet so few have the judgment to know when to fight and when not to fight.  In Texas alone, there are at least 20 firms with patent litigators qualified to understand the rules of practice and even the technology in suit.  But do they have the judgment to know when a costly defense option has no real chance of success or when another issue, if fully investigated, might win the case?  Do those firms have the conviction to tell you it’s time to settle or re-design your product?  Or to hit the opponent with everything you have until they break? We have that judgment here.

This firm has a long history of helping inventors protect their ideas.  But that is just the beginning.  We also have the experience to assist stakeholders in monetizing their IP through licensing programs or litigation, when necessary.

We have a deep bench of litigators with specialized technical backgrounds and extensive federal court experience.  But we also have the judgment to know when to fight and when not to fight.  Of course, there are times when there is no other choice but to fight.  In those cases, we are relentless.

If you want that sort of impact litigation team on your side, contact us for a consultation.

Eastern District of Texas

Resource Guide

Important Considerations for Venue in the E.D. of Texas

“Regular and Established Place of Business” within district required.

TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods (U.S. Supreme Court, 2016)

Employees working from home within district is not enough.

In re Cray, Inc. (Federal Circuit, 2017)

Third-Party contracted servers within district are not enough.

In re Google, Inc. (Federal Circuit, 2020)

Foreign corporations can be sued in any district such that TC Heartland does not apply.

In re HTC Corp. (Federal Circuit, 2018)

 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS KEY PATENT LITIGATION DEADLINES THROUGH MARKMAN HEARING

PLAINTIFF

  • Initial Disclosures
    • This deadline is often set by separate order once the defendant(s) have answered, and the Court sets the date for the Initial Case Management Conference after the initial disclosures are made. Note that the information required for disclosure may vary from Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.
  •  Preliminary Infringement Contentions (P.R. 3-1)
    • The Local Patent Rules provide for a deadline of 10 days prior to the Initial Case Management Conference. [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Accompanying Infringement Document Production (P.R. 3-2)
    • Same as above.
  • Exchange of Terms for Claim Construction (P.R. 4-1)
    • 10 days after Invalidity Contentions
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence (P.R. 4-2)
    • 20 days after P.R. 4-1 disclosures.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (P.R. 4-3)
    • 60 days after service of Invalidity Contentions.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Completion of Claim Construction Discovery (P.R. 4-4)
    • 30 days after P.R. 4-3 disclosure.
    • [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Opening Claim Construction Brief (P.R. 4-5)
    • 45 days after P.R. 4-3 disclosure.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Response Claim Construction Brief (P.R. 4-5)
    • 14 days after Opening Claim Construction Brief.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Reply Claim Construction Brief (P.R. 4-5)
    • 7 days after Defendant [s] Response Brief.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]

DEFENDANT

  • Initial Disclosures
    • This deadline is often set by separate order once the defendant(s) have answered, and the Court sets the date for the Initial Case Management Conference shortly after the deadline for initial disclosures. Note that the information required for disclosure may vary from Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.
  •  Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (P.R. 3-3)
    • 35 days after Initial Case Management Conference.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Accompanying Document Production for Invalidity Contentions (P.R. 3-4)
    • Same as above.
  • Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions
    • Certain judges require separate section 101 eligibility contentions not specified in the Local Patent Rules.
  • Advice of Counsel Defense (P.R. 3-7)
    • The Docket Control Order will set a deadline for a Defendant to produce opinions for which the attorney-client privilege is waived and related document production and privilege log.
  • Exchange of Terms for Claim Construction (P.R. 4-1)
    • 10 days after Invalidity Contentions
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  •  Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence (P.R. 4-2)
    • 20 days after P.R. 4-1 disclosures.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (P.R. 4-3)
    • 60 days after service of Invalidity Contentions
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]
  • Completion of Claim Construction Discovery (P.R. 4-4)
    • 30 days after P.R. 4-3 disclosure.
  • Responsive Claim Construction Brief (P.R. 4-5)
    • 14 days after service of Opening Brief.
      [This deadline can be varied by the Docket Control Order by a specific judge.]

Carstens, Allen & Gourley Eastern District Office

Carstens, Allen & Gourley

7500 Dallas Pkwy #300
Plano, Texas 75240

(972) 367-2001

M-F 8:30 am – 5:30 pm
Closed Saturday & Sunday

Places to Stay

There is plenty to do while you are in Plano, Texas. We recommend these hotels while you are in town.

Dallas/Plano Marriott at Legacy Town Center

7121 Bishop Road
Plano, TX 75024

Renaissance Dallas at Plano Legacy West Hotel

6007 Legacy Dr
Plano, TX 7502

Helpful Links

Western District of Texas-Waco

Patent Litigation in Waco, Texas

In the Press

Ted Baroody quoted in Bloomberg Law article, Law Firms Hang Shingles in Waco Amid Patent Litigation Boom

Places to Stay

There is plenty to do while you are in Waco, Texas. We recommend these hotels while you are in town.

Courtyard by Marriot

101 Washington Avenue
Waco, Texas 76701

Hilton Waco

113 South University Parks Drive
Waco, Texas 76701